Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 193/2025

Case between Eldho Olickal vs Madhu regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Eldho Olickal is the plaintiff, who contracted Madhu to renovate his house. The plaintiff alleges that after making payments, he discovered discrepancies and dishonoured cheques from the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff and decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff the amount owed along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.1,80,000/- along with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff and decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff the amount owed along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the existence of an enforceable debt supported by the dishonoured cheques.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established the existence of an enforceable debt supported by the dishonoured cheques.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,80,000/- with interest from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.1,80,000/-(Rupees One lakh eighty thousand only) along with interest @ 12% per annum from from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Eldho Olickal
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Madhu
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Cheque bearing no: 244983, Certified copy of Cheque bearing no: 244982, Certified copy of dishonour memo issued by South Indian Bank, Certified copy of dishonour memo issued from Federal Bank, Certified copy of the office copy of the Legal notice, Certified copy of Postal receipt, Certified copy of Acknowledgment card, Statement of account with South Indian Bank.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bonny Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Benraj K R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.1,80,000/- along with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,80,000/- with interest from defendant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant's personal assets are also liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendant shall be personally and his assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the cheque issued by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified Copy of Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows another cheque issued by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the first cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified Copy of Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the second cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified Copy of Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a statutory demand notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified Copy of Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a statutory demand notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified Copy of Postal Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified Copy of Postal Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Certified Copy of Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of acknowledgment of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Certified Copy of Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of acknowledgment of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the account transactions that are subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relates to the outcome of the complaint against the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relates to the outcome of the complaint against the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Eldho Olickal vs Madhu regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Eldho Olickal vs Madhu regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between P. K. Suryakumari vs Anil Kumar regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sherin Neauman P.S vs Bijitha Johnson regarding return of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Prasad V C vs Reshma K Nair regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunny Abraham vs Rijo E C et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Wallmaax Paints Pvt Ltd. vs Venugopal regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won