Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 206/2021

Case between K.K.Sreekumar vs K.K.Navas regarding recovery of borrowed amount

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M .
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-6 years 3 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.K.Sreekumar lent money to K.K.Navas for business development. The defendant failed to repay the loan and issued dishonored cheques, prompting the plaintiff to file multiple suits for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suits were dismissed as the plaintiff failed to prove a legally enforceable debt owed by the defendant for the issued cheques.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suits were dismissed as the plaintiff failed to prove a legally enforceable debt owed by the defendant for the issued cheques.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not prove a legally enforceable debt.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff failed to prove the legally enforceable liability for the defendant to issue any cheques to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suits are dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.K.Sreekumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.K.Navas
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copies of cheques, return memos, copy of demand notices.
Defendants Documents
Certified copies of cheques; claim of previously stolen cheques.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renjith R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anju Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabitha C.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sain Paul Alunkal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shibu P.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The Plaintiff sought to recover sums of ₹3,00,000, ₹2,00,000, ₹5,00,000, ₹3,50,000, and ₹3,50,000 from the Defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suits are dismissed.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The Plaintiff's claim for interest on the amounts borrowed.
Evidence:
In light of the finding in the above issues, the issue as to interest is also found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque bearing number 092540 was issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiff as repayment for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The return memo issued by State Bank of India indicating the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A copy of the lawyer’s notice issued to the Defendant demanding repayment of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt confirming the registration of the lawyer’s notice sent to the Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card confirming receipt of the lawyer’s notice by the Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque bearing number 421616 issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiff as repayment for a second loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The return memo indicating that this cheque was also dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the lawyer’s notice issued demanding repayment for this second loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt for the lawyer’s notice sent regarding the second loan demand.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card confirming receipt of the lawyer’s notice regarding the second loan.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque bearing number 362159 issued by the Defendant for a third loan.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Return memo indicating the dishonor of this cheque due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyer’s notice sent to demand payment for the third loan.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt evidence regarding the demand notice for the third loan.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card for the lawyer’s notice demand for the third loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque bearing number 091820 issued by the Defendant as repayment for the fourth loan.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Return memo indicating this cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyer’s notice for demanding repayment of the fourth loan.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt for the demand notice regarding the fourth loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the Defendant for the fifth loan amounting to ₹3,50,000.
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Return memo indicating dishonor due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A22
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyer’s notice demanding repayment for the fifth loan.
Reference:
Ext.A23
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt confirming the registration of the lawyer’s notice.
Reference:
Ext.A24
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card confirming receipt of the fifth loan demand.
Reference:
Ext.A25

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.K.Sreekumar vs K.K.Navas regarding recovery of borrowed amount
Case Code Year
Case between K.K.Sreekumar vs K.K.Navas regarding recovery of borrowed amount

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Arrest Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
3 months

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 11/15/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda, Vazhakkala Branch vs Pushpa P regarding Suit for realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Money Easy Fincorp vs Devasia Thomas et al. regarding realization of money
MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Kulsum Boutique and Beauty Parlour et al regarding Money Realisation
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won