Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 312 OF 2018

Case between Khadeeja vs Ummayyakutty et al regarding Partition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Khadeeja, is seeking a partition of the property that originally belonged to her mother. The defendants are the legal heirs of her deceased brother, and they did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit for partition, awarding specific shares of the property to the plaintiff and defendants. The property will be divided into 216 equal shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged as the defendants opted to remain ex parte.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows:- I. The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 216 equal shares by metes and bounds. II. The plaintiff is entitled to get 114 shares, out of such 216 shares in the plaint B schedule properties.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Khadeeja (58 years) Karakkadan House, Kurumbathoor amsom, P.O.Punnathala, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 552.

Defendants

Ummayyakutty (68 years) Kottaparambil House, Thriprangode amsom Poilissery desom, Koloopalam, Tirur Taluk. Noorjahan (45 years) Valkandi House, Pachattiri amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 105. Fatheevi (43 years) Kalliyath House, Kurumbathoor amsom desom & Post, Kattilangode Road, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676301. Ramla.K.P. (43 years) Thiruvakalathil House, Ananthavoor amsom desom & Post, Pattarnadakkavu, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 301.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A preliminary decree for partition of the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Adangal Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the plaintiff's claim regarding the property and its ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document provides a report related to the commission appointed to assess the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document outlines the plan prepared by the Advocate Commissioner for the property assessment.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases