Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1477/2018

Case between Kerala Land Commission Agents Association, Malappuram District Unit vs Kerala Land Commission Agent Association, Reg. No. 12-7/1998 regarding default dismissal

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are the Kerala Land Commission Agents Association and an individual named Muhammed Abdul Rahiman. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of interest in proceeding with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and represent their case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kerala Land Commission Agents Association, Malappuram District Unit (Age not specified years) A.M. Building, Court Road, Mancheri, PIN­67612. Muhammed Abdul Rahiman (60 years) Kadengal House, Olakara P.O, PIN­676 306, Malappuram District.

Defendants

Kerala Land Commission Agent Association (Age not specified years) 1st Floor, New Municipal Complex Oppt. KSRTC, Angamali P.O, Ernakulam­683 572, Rep. by its General Secretary. Suresh Kumar M.K (45 years) Magattuthodika, Chelassery Kunnu, Chakkalath, Nilambur, Malappuram. P.K.Gopalakrishnan (45 years) Paliyakara House, Karukutty P.O, Angamaly, Ernakulam District­683.576. C.B. Babu (42 years) Changayil, Valiyakulangara, Ochira P.O, Kollam District. M.M. Devarajan (55 years) Mangattunjalil House, Mulloorkara P.O, Thrissur District.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence, this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with the case. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases