Case Summary
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree. LILLY is the respondent who did not enter appearance, resulting in difficulties for the sale of properties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the execution petition due to the lack of bidders for the property sale.
Key Reasoning:
Decree Holder has not taken steps for bid and auction for sale.
Decree Holder has not taken steps for bid and auction for sale.
Why Defendant Won:
Decree Holder has not taken steps for bid and auction for sale.
Decree Holder has not taken steps for bid and auction for sale.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder has not taken any steps for bid and auction for sale.
Judgment Evidence:
EP is hereby closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- KERALA GRAMIN BANK
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- LILLY
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Closed
Description:
The execution petition (EP) is hereby closed due to the inability to conduct the sale of the property.
Evidence:
EP is hereby closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs LILLY regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs LILLY regarding Execution Petition