Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 378/2023

Case between The Karnataka Bank Ltd. vs Suma Raveendran et al regarding recovery of money

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-06-29
Duration
approximately-5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Karnataka Bank Ltd. filed a suit for recovery of money against Suma Raveendran and Raveendran due to unpaid vehicle loan installments. The defendants defaulted on their payments, leading the bank to classify the loan as a Non-Performing Asset.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹48,571.96 with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amount of ₹48,571.96 with 6% interest per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants failed to regularize their loan account despite multiple reminders from the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 48,571.96/- (Rupees Fourty Eight Thousand Five Hundred and Seventy One and paisa Ninety Six only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

The Karnataka Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Mahaveera Circle, P.B.No.599, Kankanady, Mangalore – 575 002

Defendants

Suma Raveendran (Age not specified years) Pottayil house, Cheranalloor, Bhagavathy Temple, kaloor S.O, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 034 Raveendran (Age not specified years) Pottayil house, Cheranalloor, Bhagavathy Temple, kaloor S.O, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 034

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks to recover the amount due along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 48,571.96/- (Rupees Fourty Eight Thousand Five Hundred and Seventy One and paisa Ninety Six only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs related to the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Credit Sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the financial assistance sanctioned to the first defendant for the vehicle loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the agreement executed by the defendant to hypothecate the vehicle as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Undertaking to Hypothecate the vehicle
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the undertaking by the defendants regarding the hypothecation of the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a formal promise to pay back the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Delivery notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the Branch Manager regarding the delivery of the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment by the defendants admitting their liability.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the financial details and outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 10/30/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Banking Company

Similar Cases