Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 355/2019

Case between Kanjiappally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Manu Dominic regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-03-27
Duration
approximately-5 years 3 months
Case Code No.
355
Case Closed
Thu, 03/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kanjiappally Service Co-operative Bank, has filed a suit against the defendant, Manu Dominic, for eviction and recovery of rent arrears. The case involves disputes over unpaid rent and the legality of the tenancy agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit by the plaintiff, ruling that it was not maintainable under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit by the plaintiff, ruling that it was not maintainable under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the dispute was within the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Arbitration Court, not the civil court.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the dispute was within the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Arbitration Court, not the civil court.
Supporting Evidence
The suit is not maintainable before this court and the suit is liable to be dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kanjiappally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Relation
represented by Secretary in Charge Shyju K. Francis
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manu Dominic
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o Dominic V.J.
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed Nos. 2802/73, 1166/69, 3568/70 and 69/64 of the SRO, Kanjirappally; building tax and land tax receipts; lawyers notices demanding arrears of rent.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Darly M. Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bilu G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff seeks eviction of the defendant from the premises.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed with cost.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff claims arrears of rent of Rs.1,24,527/-.
Evidence:
The claim of the plaintiff with respect to the arrears of rent is vague and there is no proof before the court to ascertain that the rent to be paid by the defendant is Rs.1483/- per month.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff claims mesne profits at the rate of Rs.4000/- per month.
Evidence:
The claim of the plaintiff that he is entitled to get Rs.4000/- per month since 01.07.2019 is unacceptable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To establish ownership of the property in which the shop room is situated.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A1(c)
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show the plaintiff is paying tax for the building.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show the plaintiff is paying land tax for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To evidence the demand for arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To evidence the demand for arrears of rent and termination of the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To evidence the demand for mesne profits and vacating the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Decision of the Administrator
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show authorization for the Secretary to file cases against tenants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show that the present Secretary is authorized to represent the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Defendant did not present any documentary evidence.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Sat, 06/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Co-operative Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Sreepadmanabha Vilasam N.S.S. Karayogam vs Kerala State et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aneesh Kurian vs Abdul Khadar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bobby Mani vs The Kerala State Beverages Corporation regarding recovery of damages and arrears of rent.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Boobily Peter vs Reliance Infratel Limited regarding injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jose Mathew et al vs K.S.Ninan regarding arrears of rent.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won