Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 153/2022

Case between Aneesh Kurian vs Abdul Khadar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-3 years 11 months
Case Code No.
153
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aneesh Kurian, a tenant, filed a suit against Abdul Khadar and Isha Abdul Khadar for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent forced eviction and obstruction of his business. The defendants counterclaimed seeking a decree to restrain Aneesh from conducting a coffee shop and cool bar in the rented premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction is decreed, restraining the defendants from forcibly evicting the plaintiff or obstructing his business in the rented shop rooms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is granted restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule shop room, obstructing the business therein, forcibly evicting plaintiff therefrom and committing wastes in the shop room.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction is decreed, restraining the defendants from forcibly evicting the plaintiff or obstructing his business in the rented shop rooms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff, being a statutory tenant, cannot be evicted without due process of law, and the court found no evidence of misuse of property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff, being a statutory tenant, cannot be evicted without due process of law, and the court found no evidence of misuse of property.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence would show that the plaintiff is conducting coffee shop and cool bar in the rented premises after obtaining necessary license.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result counterclaim is dismissed and the suit is decreed as follows:- 1A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is granted restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from trespassing into the plaint schedule shop room, obstructing the business therein, forcibly evicting plaintiff therefrom and committing wastes in the shop room.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aneesh Kurian
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Khadar
Party Age
65
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Isha Abdul Khadar
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent agreement dated 29.02.2021, various licenses issued for business activities.
Defendants Documents
Order in I.A 1/2023 in RCP 3/2023 of the Rent Control Kanjirappally.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sony Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Muhammed Haris K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendants from forcibly evicting the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendants are to be restrained from forcibly evicting the plaintiff from the shop room.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Counter claim for Permanent Prohibitory Injunction against conducting coffee shop and cool bar.
Evidence:
Counterclaim is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes payment of building tax for the petition schedule shop rooms.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Application for Licence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A request to obtain license from Mundakayam Grama Panchayath.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves sending of communication related to business.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Written complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint filed by the plaintiff concerning business operations.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate issued by Food Safety and Standards Authority of India.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Medical Fitness Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate related to health standards for food handling.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sanitary Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies hygiene compliance for business operations.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
License issued by Mundakayam Grama Panchayath for conducting business.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of a court order vacating an ex-parte injunction.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Order directing plaintiff to pay arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Memorandum
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Records communication in the Rent Control proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Memo
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Series of memos related to the Rent Control proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.B2 Series
Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report prepared by the court-appointed commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual reference provided by the commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Tue, 03/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sreepadmanabha Vilasam N.S.S. Karayogam vs Kerala State et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kanjiappally Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Manu Dominic regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bobby Mani vs The Kerala State Beverages Corporation regarding recovery of damages and arrears of rent.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Boobily Peter vs Reliance Infratel Limited regarding injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jose Mathew et al vs K.S.Ninan regarding arrears of rent.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won