Case Summary
Petitioner Nafeesa sought restoration against multiple respondents resulting in the petition being allowed upon payment of Rs 3000.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition
Case Type
Civil Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was granted upon payment of Rs 3000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition stands allowed on payment of Rs 3000/- and for payment on 28-10-2016. On 28-10-2016 Cost paid. Petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kandath Valappil Nafeesa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Takarapeediyekkal Muhammedali @ Bava
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koolath Saidalavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koolath Muhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Palliyeri Moidu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Palliyeri Abdulla @ Kochu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koolath Ummer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Palliyelil Suharabi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Palliyeri Kunhan Bava
Plaintiffs Documents
Counter filed
Defendants Documents
Counter filed
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration allowed upon payment of Rs 3000
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2016