Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.P 554/2017

Case between Abdul Azeez vs Rahmath regarding petition restoration

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2017-06-17
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 25 days
Case Code No.
554
Case Closed
Sat, 06/17/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Abdul Azeez filed a petition seeking restoration due to the death of the previous counsel stating he was not the owner of the matter.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition seeking restoration was allowed by the court due to the death of the previous counsel.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition restoration
Case Type
Civil Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition seeking restoration was allowed by the court due to the death of the previous counsel.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Heard. The counsel for the petitioner is filed this petition by stating the reason that counsel died and he was not the owner of the matter. Hence allowed as sufficient reason. Hence allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Azeez
Party Age
1
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahmath
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Rahmath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Petition restoration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To restore the petition due to the death of the previous counsel.
Evidence:
Heard. The counsel for the petitioner is filed this petition by stating the reason that counsel died and he was not the owner of the matter. Hence allowed as sufficient reason. Hence allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.P
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 02/20/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/17/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Tharaparambil Chandramathi vs Valiyaparambil Baby et al regarding delay condonation
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil - Delay Condonation Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kuttikrishnan vs Velayudhan et al regarding restoration of suit
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.P.Sayyid Ali vs Karakkadan Muhammed et al regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration of Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandath Valappil Nafeesa vs Takarapeediyekkal Muhammedali et al regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Fahad vs Alachampat Bava Haji regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won