Case Summary
Two plaintiffs filed a suit for partition against three defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition The Counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiffs are called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Kadeeja (30 years)
Chaliyil, Mambra, Post Kalpakancheri
Rehna (28 years)
Vettom Pallipram amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Muhammed (54 years)
Kurumbathoor amsom, Chellur desom, Post Punnathala, Tirur Taluk
Ali (52 years)
Kalpakancheri amsom, deosm, Post Kalpakancheri, Tirur Taluk
Moideen (50 years)
Manhilas Padi, Kozhichena, Post Valakkulam, Tirurangadi Taluk
Pathumma (47 years)
Paroli Veedu, Valiyad, Post Chemmankadav, Perinthalmanna Taluk
Muithutty (44 years)
Kurumbathoor amsom, Cheloor desom, Punnathala Post, Tirur Taluk
Yoosaf (42 years)
Kurumbathoor amsom, Cheloor desom, Punnathala Post, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Partition of property among the parties
Evidence:
Suit for partition The Counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiffs are called. Absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed for default.