Case Summary
Two plaintiffs, Kadalayi Hussain and Bushra, filed a suit against defendant Manedath Khadeeja seeking a mandatory injunction. The matter was settled between the parties through a compromise petition, resulting in the suit being dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Compromise petition is filed as I.A.1711/2014. Since the compromise is lawful, I.A.1711/2014 is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kadalayi Hussain @ Bava Haj
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o. Kadalayi Ahammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bushra
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o. Kadalai Hussain @ Bava Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ahammed Kabeer
- Party Age
- 24
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manedath Khadeeja
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o. Abdul Kader
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction against the defendant.
Evidence:
Compromise petition is filed as I.A.1711/2014. Since the compromise is lawful, I.A.1711/2014 is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
State
Court Establishment
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kadalayi Hussain @ Bava Haj and Bushra vs Manedath Khadeeja regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kadalayi Hussain @ Bava Haj and Bushra vs Manedath Khadeeja regarding mandatory injunction