Case Summary
K.A. Antony filed a rent control petition against Thomas Anslem. The petition was dismissed as the respondent had deposited the rent arrears before the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the deposited rent amount and dismissed the rent control petition.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The petitioner is at liberty to withdraw the amount so deposited. Rent control petition is dismissed accordingly.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.A. Antony
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas Anslem
- Party Age
- 48
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.C. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.A. Shaji Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P. Rexy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Reji George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. Jayasankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petitioner is not pressing the rent control petition as the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court.
Evidence:
The counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court, he is not pressing the rent control petition.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.A. Antony vs Thomas Anslem regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between K.A. Antony vs Thomas Anslem regarding rent control