Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 167/2010

Case between K.A. Antony vs Thomas Anslem regarding rent control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.A. Antony filed a rent control petition against Thomas Anslem. The petition was dismissed as the respondent had deposited the rent arrears before the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the deposited rent amount and dismissed the rent control petition.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

The petitioner is at liberty to withdraw the amount so deposited. Rent control petition is dismissed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K.A. Antony (68 years years) Kalluveettil House, Jaison Building, P.T. Usha road, Ernakulam­11

Defendants

Thomas Anslem (48 years years) A 2 Z Sanitary Wares, P.T. Usha road, Ernakulam, Kochi­11

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petitioner is not pressing the rent control petition as the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court.
Evidence:
The counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court, he is not pressing the rent control petition.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases