Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 377 /2014

Case between K R Mani vs Lizy C.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
approximately-10 years 6 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves K R Mani as the petitioner and Lizy C.J as the respondent. K R Mani filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree that was passed against him in 2015.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by K R Mani was dismissed as not pressed since he was not represented in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by K R Mani was dismissed as not pressed since he was not represented in court.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was not represented in court during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was not represented in court during the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lizy C.J
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K R Mani
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Kumar P V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Enoch David Simon Joel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S Sreedev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rony Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Leo Lukose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Karan Scaria Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Derick Mathai Saji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ittoop Joy Thattil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Karol Mathews Sebastian Alencherry
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the ex parte decree passed against the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K R Mani vs Lizy C.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
Case Code Year
Case between K R Mani vs Lizy C.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 02/18/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vasudevan Pillai vs Muhammed Haneeffa C et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Johny Thomas vs Shiju alias Thampi regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Elsy James vs P.C Jose regarding restoration of original suit.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won