Case Summary
K. Mohammedali filed a complaint against K.T Abdul Nasar alleging commission of offense under U/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint filed by the complainant against the accused was dismissed by the court due to the absence of the complainant.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, Complaint dismissed u/s.204(4) Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K. Mohammedali
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.T Abdul Nasar
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M Abdul Khader
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shameer Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The complaint filed by the complainant against the accused alleging commission of offense punishable u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act was dismissed.
Evidence:
In the result, Complaint dismissed u/s.204(4) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K. Mohammedali vs K.T Abdul Nasar regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between K. Mohammedali vs K.T Abdul Nasar regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act