Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1140/2025

Case between K A Michael Babu, Cyril Shibu vs Geroge Victor regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, K A Michael Babu and Cyril Shibu, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against the respondent, Geroge Victor. The court ordered an interim injunction to prevent the respondent from obstructing the plaintiffs' use of a pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioners a temporary injunction to prevent the respondent from interfering with their use of the pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction issued restraining the respondent and his men from obstructing the plaintiffs' use of the pathway.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners made out a prima facie case indicating that without the injunction, irreparable injury could occur.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondent and his men from obstructing the plaintiffs from using the C schedule pathway.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K A Michael Babu (63 years years) Karakkaparambil House, Ponjikkara, Mulavukadu P O, Ernakulam - 682 504 Cyril Shibu (68 years years) Karakkaparambil House, Ponjikkara, Mulavukadu P O, Ernakulam - 682 504

Defendants

Geroge Victor (81 years years) Flat No. D-301, Near D Mart/Hiranandini Gardens, Powai Park CHS High School, Powai Lit. S.O. Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400 076

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondent and his men from obstructing the plaintiffs from using the C schedule pathway.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondent and his men from obstructing the plaintiffs from using the C schedule pathway or altering the present nature and condition of the pathway or to do any act which is detrimental to the plaintiffs and their men in using the pathway for their ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property from the Mulavukad panchayath public road until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases