Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 23/2023

Case between Julie Stanly vs Ruban Chacko regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-09
Duration
approximately-5 years 5 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Julie Stanly, the plaintiff, who alleges that the defendant Ruban Chacko had received money from her but failed to fulfill the promises made. The defendant issued a cheque which was dishonoured, leading the plaintiff to seek recovery of the owed amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the sum of 4,50,000/- with interest. The defendant must also cover additional costs associated with the court proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay 4,50,000/- with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the sum of 4,50,000/- with interest. The defendant must also cover additional costs associated with the court proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided uncontested evidence proving the defendant's liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided uncontested evidence proving the defendant's liability.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,50,000/- (Rupees four lakhs fifty thousand only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Julie Stanly
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ruban Chacko
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Cheque bearing No. 000001, Cheque Return Memo, Office copy of Legal Notice, Postal Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu P. J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 4,50,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,50,000/- (Rupees four lakhs fifty thousand only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs (excluding the court fee and legal benefit fund) of the suit from the defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The government is entitled to recover an amount of 47,900/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The government is entitled to recover an amount of 47,900/- from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original cheque was presented to support the plaintiff's claim for the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The return memo indicated that the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice served to the defendant was referenced as part of the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment card confirmed the receipt of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Julie Stanly vs Ruban Chacko regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Julie Stanly vs Ruban Chacko regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Kochi
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sherin Neauman P.S vs Bijitha Johnson regarding return of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Prasad V C vs Reshma K Nair regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunny Abraham vs Rijo E C et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Eldho Olickal vs Madhu regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Wallmaax Paints Pvt Ltd. vs Venugopal regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won