Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 64/2020

Case between Jude A. Vallannatt vs M.O. Poulose regarding rent control.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jude A. Vallannatt filed a rent control petition against M.O. Poulose. The matter was settled in mediation and the court allowed the petition based on the mediation report.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The mediation report was accepted, and the rent control petition was allowed. The agreement was found to be lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The mediation report was accepted, and the rent control petition was allowed. The agreement was found to be lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties entered into a lawful agreement voluntarily.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties entered into a lawful agreement voluntarily.
Supporting Evidence
The parties are entered into the agreement voluntarily and is signed by both parties. The terms are found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the rent control petition is allowed in terms of mediation report. Mediation report shall form part of order. Rent control petition is closed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jude A. Vallannatt
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.O. Poulose
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Leelalakshmi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashok B. Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.S. Giresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abhilash O.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Riyal Devassy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arjun R. Naik
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence, the rent control petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jude A. Vallannatt vs M.O. Poulose regarding rent control.
Case Code Year
Case between Jude A. Vallannatt vs M.O. Poulose regarding rent control.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh P., Subhadra Thampuran vs Zachariah Thomas T. regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Antony Jain M.C. vs Mini Baby regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won