Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 64/2020

Case between Jude A. Vallannatt vs M.O. Poulose regarding rent control.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jude A. Vallannatt filed a rent control petition against M.O. Poulose. The matter was settled in mediation and the court allowed the petition based on the mediation report.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The mediation report was accepted, and the rent control petition was allowed. The agreement was found to be lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties entered into a lawful agreement voluntarily.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the rent control petition is allowed in terms of mediation report. Mediation report shall form part of order. Rent control petition is closed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jude A. Vallannatt (53 years) Vallanatt House, Banerji Road, Ernakulam North P.O., Ernakulam-682018

Defendants

M.O. Poulose (61 years) Madassery House, Mookkannoor P.O., Ernakulam, Building No.67/1632 (old No.41/3249 C), Holy family Building, Ashir Bhavan Lane, Banerji Road, Ernakulam-682 018

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence, the rent control petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases