Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 917/2019

Case between Joy Scaria vs Mr. Raju Abraham et al regarding recovery of money

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-24
Duration
approximately-4 years 8 months
Case Closed
Wed, 01/24/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joy Scaria, the plaintiff, is seeking to recover a security deposit and excess rent from Raju Abraham and Abad Builders Pvt Ltd, the defendants, following a leave and license agreement for an apartment. The defendants deny the claims and argue that the suit is barred by limitation and lacks merit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed by the court, finding no merit in the plaintiff's claims. The court determined that the defendants had valid reasons for withholding part of the security deposit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed by the court, finding no merit in the plaintiff's claims. The court determined that the defendants had valid reasons for withholding part of the security deposit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff could not prove the claims regarding the return of security deposit and excess rent.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff could not prove the claims regarding the return of security deposit and excess rent.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff could not prove that he had given any notice to the 1st defendant before he vacated the premises.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joy Scaria
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Raju Abraham
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Managing Director, Abad Builders Pvt Ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
Leave and License Agreement No. 4920, Copy of lawyer notice, Original KSEB bill, Original maintenance and moving out charges receipt.
Defendants Documents
Original certificate issued by KSEB.

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Benny Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bindu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover Rs. 16,703/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Hence, on the consideration of the facts and circumstances, evidence on record and materials before this court it can be safely concluded that ... the suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Leave and License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement under which the plaintiff occupied the apartment.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent by the plaintiff to the defendants demanding the return of the security deposit.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Response from the first defendant to the plaintiff's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Second defendant's reply to the allegations made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: KSEB Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the electricity bill payment by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: KSEB Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing another electricity bill payment by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Payment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt of payment for KSEB bill issued to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Payment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another receipt of payment for KSEB bill issued to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Due Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the dues from Daffodil Gardens for maintenance.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Receipt for Maintenance and Moving Out Charges
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing charges paid for maintenance and moving out.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate from KSEB regarding the electricity payment made by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Joy Scaria vs Mr. Raju Abraham et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Joy Scaria vs Mr. Raju Abraham et al regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 05/20/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/24/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won