Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S150/2022

Case between Joseph vs Annamma.P.J., Mariyamma.P.J. regarding compromise terms

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-01-15
Duration
Case Code No.
150
Case Closed
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Joseph as the plaintiff and Annamma.P.J. and Mariyamma.P.J. as defendants. The matter was settled through a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the terms of the compromise petition filed by the parties and decreed the suit as per the terms of the agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the terms of the compromise petition filed by the parties and decreed the suit as per the terms of the agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled through a legally enforceable compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled through a legally enforceable compromise.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of compromise are legally enforceable.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed as per terms of agreement. Terms of compromise and Commission Report shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annamma.P.J.
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mariyamma.P.J.
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.N.Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Matin Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed as per terms of agreement.
Evidence:
Suit decreed as per terms of agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Forms part of the decree as per the terms of compromise.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sivanandan Pillai et al vs Suresh regarding default dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumaran et al vs Sajeev et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Balachandran Nair vs Sundaresan Nair et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Reny Reji @ Reny Yoyokki vs Babu et al regarding compromise agreement.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Girijakuttyamma vs Valsalakumariamma et al regarding Compromise Agreement
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Unknown