Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 88/2021

Case between Balachandran Nair vs Sundaresan Nair et al regarding suit dismissed for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-04-01
Duration
Case Code No.
88
Case Closed
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Balachandran Nair as the plaintiff and Sundaresan Nair along with Udayanapuram Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as defendants. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not turn up.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Submitted plaintiff not turned up.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Balachandran Nair
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sundaresan Nair
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Udayanapuram Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Relation
represented through its President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Udayanapuram Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Relation
represented through its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Malu Johnson
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D.Subhash Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not turning up.
Evidence:
Submitted plaintiff not turned up. Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sivanandan Pillai et al vs Suresh regarding default dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumaran et al vs Sajeev et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Reny Reji @ Reny Yoyokki vs Babu et al regarding compromise agreement.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph vs Annamma.P.J., Mariyamma.P.J. regarding compromise terms
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Girijakuttyamma vs Valsalakumariamma et al regarding Compromise Agreement
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Unknown