Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 3/2020

Case between Girijakuttyamma vs Valsalakumariamma et al regarding Compromise Agreement

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-02-06
Duration
Case Code No.
3
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Girijakuttyamma as the plaintiff and Valsalakumariamma and others as defendants. The matter is about a legal dispute which was finally heard and settled through a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit and counter claim were decreed in terms of a compromise agreement between the parties. The terms of the agreement were found to be legally enforceable.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit and counter claim were decreed in terms of a compromise agreement between the parties. The terms of the agreement were found to be legally enforceable.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Matter settled. Suit and counter claim decreed in terms of Compromise. Compromise petition filed. Perused. Terms of agreement are found to be legally enforceable.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Girijakuttyamma
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsalakumariamma
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o. Late Sivasankaran Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Somasundranan Nair
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anju
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.N.Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compromise petition was filed and the suit decreed as per compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Suit and counter claim decreed in terms of Compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report and plan shall form part of the decree.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sivanandan Pillai et al vs Suresh regarding default dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumaran et al vs Sajeev et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Balachandran Nair vs Sundaresan Nair et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Reny Reji @ Reny Yoyokki vs Babu et al regarding compromise agreement.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph vs Annamma.P.J., Mariyamma.P.J. regarding compromise terms
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won