R.C.P. No. 09/2023

Case between Joseph Martin vs Dilkumar regarding Rent Control matters

Court

COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.

Order Date

2024-12-02

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph Martin filed a petition against Dilkumar under the Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act, 1965. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the petitioner's lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner was not represented in court. Therefore, the matter could not proceed.

Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not show interest in prosecuting the case further by failing to appear in court.

Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner did not show interest in prosecuting the case further by failing to appear in court.

Supporting Evidence

The petitioner was not represented during the hearing and did not file any proof affidavit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of the view that petitioner is not interested to prosecute further with the matter. Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Joseph Martin
Party Age: 66
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Dilkumar
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P. Sivaraj & Mehar Farsana M.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P.T. Jose & Althaf P.A.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Petition dismissed for default due to no representation from the petitioner.

Evidence: