Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP. No. 14/2024

Case between Jose Mathew vs Shaffi Kurumpelil regarding rent control petition

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL RENT CONTROL
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Jose Mathew, seeks possession of a scheduled building due to the respondent, Shaffi Kurumpelil, failing to deposit the arrears as directed. The court has delivered its order on this matter.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petitioner has been granted possession of the scheduled building as the respondent did not comply with the previous order regarding arrears.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the plaint scheduled building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petitioner has been granted possession of the scheduled building as the respondent did not comply with the previous order regarding arrears.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to deposit the arrears as previously directed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to deposit the arrears as previously directed.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent has not deposited the arrears as directed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence invoking section 12(3) of the BRC Act, it is directed that the petitioner shall be put in vacant possession of the plaint scheduled building.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose Mathew
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaffi Kurumpelil
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Karjet
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arathy K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B L Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner shall be put in vacant possession of the plaint scheduled building.
Evidence:
it is directed that the petitioner shall be put in vacant possession of the plaint scheduled building.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jose Mathew vs Shaffi Kurumpelil regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Jose Mathew vs Shaffi Kurumpelil regarding rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
KOTTAYAM
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sulatha Mathew et al vs M/s Asianet Digital Net Work Private Company Ltd. regarding Rent Control Petition
Court of the Rent Controller, Kottayam
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Sulatha Mathew vs M/s Asianet Digital Network Private Company Ltd. regarding rent control petition.
Munsiff's Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Faisal M. E et al vs Sajith A.J regarding Rent Control Petition
THE RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Jose Mathew et al vs Thomas John regarding possession of a building
Court of the Rent Controller, Kottayam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Annakutty A M vs Liz George regarding rent control
The Principal Rent Controller
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won