Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1010 /2019

Case between Jolly Cherian et al vs Andrews et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-07-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Jolly Cherian and P.C. Cherian as plaintiffs against Andrews, K.J. Joy, and Shibu as defendants regarding permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter was settled, and the plaintiffs do not wish to proceed further.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit is dismissed as not pressed and settled, as the parties reached a settlement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result suit is dismissed as not pressed and settled.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jolly Cherian (46 years) Pulikkottil House, Kolatheri Road, Maradu.P.O., Maradu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 304 P.C. Cherian (56 years) Pulikkottil House, Kolatheri Road, Maradu.P.O., Maradu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 304

Defendants

Andrews (55 years) Kozhuvallil House, Panangad, Kumbalam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Panangad.P.O., Pin – 682 506 K.J.Joy (72 years) Kozhuvallil House, Panangad, Kumbalam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Panangad.P.O., Pin – 682 506 Shibu (50 years) Kozhuvallil House, Panangad, Kumbalam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Panangad.P.O., Pin – 682 506

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases