Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1010 /2019

Case between Jolly Cherian et al vs Andrews et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-07-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Jolly Cherian and P.C. Cherian as plaintiffs against Andrews, K.J. Joy, and Shibu as defendants regarding permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter was settled, and the plaintiffs do not wish to proceed further.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit is dismissed as not pressed and settled, as the parties reached a settlement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed as not pressed and settled, as the parties reached a settlement.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result suit is dismissed as not pressed and settled.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jolly Cherian
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.C. Cherian
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Andrews
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.J.Joy
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu
Party Age
50
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh.R.Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Samson.T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.C.Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.P.Rexy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jolly Cherian et al vs Andrews et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jolly Cherian et al vs Andrews et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Santharam et al vs R. Ramesh et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between V. N Ranganathan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction and consequential relief
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jose John vs Golden Metro Apartment Owners Association et al regarding violations of association bylaws and waste collection
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between K.S. Vinod vs Dr. S. Satish Bhat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding appointments of Chancellor & Finance Officer
The Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Injunction Defendant Won