Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1048/2022

Case between Johnson Samuel vs Ambujakshan et al regarding recovery of money

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-08-07
Duration
approximately-2 years 3 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Johnson Samuel, a businessman, filed a suit against Ambujakshan and Baby for recovering a loan of Rs. 4,00,000 extended for Anjusha's marriage. The defendants failed to repay the loan as agreed and disputed the allegations.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay Rs. 4,29,000 along with interest. It found the plaintiff's claims credible despite the defendants' denials.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay Rs. 4,29,000 with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of the suit till payment or realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay Rs. 4,29,000 along with interest. It found the plaintiff's claims credible despite the defendants' denials.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's evidence was consistent and credible, establishing the transaction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's evidence was consistent and credible, establishing the transaction.
Supporting Evidence
The execution of Ext A1 promissory note and the transaction as consideration for execution is proved to the satisfaction of this court. Thus, the point is found in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1) Defendant shall pay Rs. 4,29,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of the suit till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Johnson Samuel
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ambujakshan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baby
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand promissory note executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff, copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendants, track record details of the postal department pertaining to delivery of notice on the 1st defendant, track record details of the postal department pertaining to delivery of notice on the 2nd defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese C Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sushanth Shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Premjith Menon S.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.J.Stephen
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D.Maneksha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cherian Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's claim for recovery of Rs. 4,29,000 with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. Defendant shall pay Rs. 4,29,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of the suit till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff as part of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notification issued to the defendants regarding the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Track record details of postal department
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pertains to delivery of notice on the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Track record details of postal department
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pertains to delivery of notice on the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Johnson Samuel vs Ambujakshan et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Johnson Samuel vs Ambujakshan et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 04/23/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won