Case Summary
The petitioners are the defendants represented by their power of attorney holder, while the plaintiffs include John, Mani, Aleyamma John, and Rijo John. The case involves a dispute over survey plans and commission reports concerning certain properties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has partly allowed the petition, returning the report and plan to the commissioner for rectification of noted defects.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is partly allowed. The report and plan are returned to the commissioner for curing the defects as noted above.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- John
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mani
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aleyamma John @ Thankamma
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rijo John
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sheena Abraham
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shino Abrham
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Benny Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. Karjet
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- George Kurian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abu Joseph P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.T. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatoory Injunction
Outcome:
Partly Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed in part to return the report and plan to the commissioner for rectification.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is partly allowed. The report and plan are returned to the commissioner for curing the defects as noted above.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The court looked into the commission report prepared regarding the disputed properties.
Reference:
I.A.5/23
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The court noted that a prior commission report already addressed some matters.
Reference:
IA No.660/2018
Document Type:
Survey Plan
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The court considered the survey plan prepared along with the commission report.
Reference:
I.A.5/23
Document Type:
Survey Plan
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The court referenced the survey plan obtained from a prior commission report.
Reference:
IA No.660/2018
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2015