Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 73/2023

Case between Jayan M.C. vs Annamma Jose regarding mandatory injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY.
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Code No.
73
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jayan M.C. filed a counterclaim against Annamma Jose seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate a property. The case involved the purchase of property and a subsequent disagreement over a license to reside.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The counterclaim is partly decreed, granting a mandatory injunction directing Annamma Jose to vacate the property within two months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of mandatory injunction directing the counterclaim defendant to vacate the building in the counterclaim schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The counterclaim is partly decreed, granting a mandatory injunction directing Annamma Jose to vacate the property within two months.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found credible evidence from the counterclaim plaintiff regarding ownership and conditions of the agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found credible evidence from the counterclaim plaintiff regarding ownership and conditions of the agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted evidence of DW1 would show that counterclaim defendant is residing in the counterclaim schedule property though the license was terminated on 13.12.2022.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the counterclaim is partly decreed as follows: 1A decree of mandatory injunction is granted directing the counterclaim defendant to vacate the building in the counterclaim schedule property within two months from the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayan M.C.
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annamma Jose
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No.9/2017 of the SRO, Vazhoor; land tax receipt; ownership certificate; building tax receipt.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajan Mathew K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Mandatory injunction directing the counterclaim defendant to vacate the building in the counterclaim schedule property.
Evidence:
A decree of mandatory injunction is granted directing the counterclaim defendant to vacate the building in the counterclaim schedule property within two months.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counterclaim plaintiff is entitled to get the cost of the suit from counterclaim defendant.
Evidence:
Counterclaim plaintiff is entitled to get the cost of the suit from counterclaim defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Shows that counterclaim plaintiff/2nd defendant purchased the counterclaim schedule property from the plaintiff/counterclaim defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proves that the counterclaim plaintiff has been paying tax for the counterclaim schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Ownership Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes ownership of the counterclaim schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further evidence of payment and ties to the counterclaim schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won