Case Summary
Jayadeep, the petitioner, filed a petition requesting to refer the case to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The case involves a dispute about the election process within the Young Women’s Christian Association.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The petition to refer the matter to arbitration was dismissed by the court. The court found no valid arbitration agreement between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that no valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties.
The court determined that no valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that no valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties.
The court determined that no valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of view that there is no valid arbitration agreement between the parties which requires reference under Sec.8(1) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayadeep
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soumini Jayan
- Party Age
- 92
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Annamma Joseph
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarasa Mathews
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valsa Aravind
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saru Suresh
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Reji George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saisankar.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph Raju Mathews
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajith Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shibu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.C.Xavier
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abhilash.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vrinda Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sidharth.P.Sasi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Basil Baby Cheruvillil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aman Manzoor
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun Joseph Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Meenakshi Krishna.S.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Raji Mahesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Petition filed by 1st defendant under section 8 (1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to refer the matter for arbitration.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayadeep vs Soumini Jayan et al regarding a petition to refer parties to arbitration.
Case Code Year
Case between Jayadeep vs Soumini Jayan et al regarding a petition to refer parties to arbitration.