Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 347/2022

Case between James Netto vs Krishnankutty regarding realization of money

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-4 years 1 month 27 days
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

James Netto filed a suit against Krishnankutty for the recovery of an advance amount of Rs.3,00,000/- paid for an agreement to purchase property. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant failed to provide necessary documents and thus breached the agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to refund Rs.3,00,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest thereon @ 6% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of realisation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to refund Rs.3,00,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant breached the agreement by not providing the necessary documents for legal scrutiny.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant breached the agreement by not providing the necessary documents for legal scrutiny.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff outweighs that of the defendant and appears to be more probable and true. The plaintiff has proved his case by preponderance of probability.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) from the defendant with interest thereon @ 6% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
James Netto
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnankutty
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original agreement for sale, Lawyer’s notice, Reply notice, Statement of Bank account of plaintiff.
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1759/2007, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 951/2020, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 2594/2021, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 2608/2021, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 04/2021.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
O. Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Binu Jelson
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.R. Madhu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. Dipu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sooraj T.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John T. Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soman K.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Justin Bose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs.3,00,000/- from the defendant with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) from the defendant with interest thereon @ 6% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The general rule is that costs shall follow the event. In this case this court find no reason to deviate from this rule.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original agreement for sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement for sale dated 01.02.2021 was essential to establish the plaintiff's claim for recovery of the advance amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice dated 25.01.2022 served as a formal request for the refund of the advance amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document served by the defendant as a response to the plaintiff's legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Bank account of plaintiff
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed the transaction of Rs.3,00,000/- credited to the defendant's account.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certificate under the Bankers Book Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided certification related to the bank account transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document evidencing the defendant’s claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document evidencing a previous sale concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document evidencing a previous sale concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document evidencing a previous sale concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document evidencing a previous sale concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Original Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Receipt documenting the advance payment made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Original passbook
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Showing the financial records of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document evidencing a previous sale concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided clarity on the status of the property concerning encumbrances.
Reference:
Ext.B9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between James Netto vs Krishnankutty regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between James Netto vs Krishnankutty regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 02/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won