Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 337/2023

Case between James Jacob vs The Chief Manager and Authorised Officer regarding loan recovery

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-01-15
Duration
approximately-5 years 9 months
Case Code No.
337
Case Closed
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a loan of Rs.2 crore taken by James Jacob from The South Indian Bank Ltd. The plaintiff defaulted on repayment, leading the bank to take symbolic possession of the mortgaged property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for maintainability and dismissed the suit, ruling that it does not have jurisdiction over the matter.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for maintainability and dismissed the suit, ruling that it does not have jurisdiction over the matter.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the suit is not maintainable as the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Thus the points are found in favour of the petitioner / defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the petition is allowed. In view of the order in this IA suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
James Jacob
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Chief Manager and Authorised Officer (Under SARFAESI ACT), The South Indian Bank Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Judgment in WP(c) No. 14607 of 2024 of Hon’ble High Court of Kerala, Deed of declaration from the mortgagor.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreenath D.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sony Thomas.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed.
Evidence:
In the result the petition is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The IA suit is dismissed.
Evidence:
In view of the order in this IA suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The judgment of the Hon’ble High Court dated 8.04.2024 is referenced as supporting the argument against the jurisdiction of the civil court.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Deed of declaration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The deed of declaration executed by the plaintiff states that the mortgaged property is a non-agricultural land.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won