Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1363/2019

Case between J. K Enterprises vs Valsalan K.P regarding realization of amount on promissory note

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-26
Duration
approximately-5 years 2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, J. K Enterprises, claims the defendant, Valsalan K.P, failed to repay an amount borrowed on a promissory note. The case involves allegations of willful default and disputes over interest rates and the validity of the money lending transaction.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, concluding that the plaintiff failed to establish the cause of action and proper documentation regarding the money lending claim.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff did not properly establish the cause of action and failed to provide necessary evidence and documentation for the claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jacob K.A (46 years) Koduvathara House, Cheranelloor Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Defendants

Valsalan K.P (50 years) Korappilly House, Kanjuppadam, now residing at Cheranellur Kara, Manjummal Kavala, Cheranellur P.O, PIN – 682 034

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover a total amount of ₹59,300/-.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the amount borrowed by the defendant from the plaintiff and the terms of repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the plaintiff had made a demand for repayment of the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the fact that a notice was sent to the defendant regarding the repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Ledger Book of J.K Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to validate the transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Page of Ledger Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to validate a specific transaction in the ledger.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Page of Ledger Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to validate a specific transaction in the ledger.
Reference:
Ext.A4(b)
Document Type: Day Book of J.K Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to demonstrate the business transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Page of Day Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was subject to proof to validate a specific transaction in the day book.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Money Lending Licence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence of the plaintiff's authorization to conduct money lending business.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Thu, 08/25/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases