Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 343/2023

Case between J. K. Enterprises vs Francis E.J. regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-2 years 0 days
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, J. K. Enterprises, is a money lending enterprise. The defendant, Francis E.J., failed to repay a loan taken from the plaintiff, leading to the lawsuit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant owes the plaintiff an amount of 5840/- with interest and costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay 5840/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant owes the plaintiff an amount of 5840/- with interest and costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was proven through uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's case was proven through uncontested evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 5840/- (Rupees five thousand eight hundred and forty only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
J. K. Enterprises
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jacob K.A.
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Francis E.J.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory Note, Office copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal Receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vijayan Mannaly
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 5840/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 5840/- (Rupees five thousand eight hundred and forty only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a notice to the defendant regarding the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the delivery of the lawyer's notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between J. K. Enterprises vs Francis E.J. regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between J. K. Enterprises vs Francis E.J. regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 06/30/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won