Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1400/2019

Case between Harvest caterers (P)Ltd vs Vijayan Sankar regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-06-29
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months
Case Closed
Sat, 06/29/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Harvest caterers (P)Ltd filed a suit against Vijayan Sankar for the recovery of Rs. 2,39,355, alleging that he misappropriated money collected from a customer. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to an ex parte decision.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs. 2,39,355 from the defendant. In addition, the plaintiff was granted interest on the amount due.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 2,39,355 with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover Rs. 2,39,355 from the defendant. In addition, the plaintiff was granted interest on the amount due.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their case through unchallenged oral testimony and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their case through unchallenged oral testimony and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Upon perusing the unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 and Ext. A1 to A7, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 2,39,355 from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Harvest caterers (P)Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayan Sankar
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of attorney, Copy of invoice dated 08.06.2019, Copy of invoice dated 09.06.2019, Original agreement for settlement dated 30.07.2019, Original promissory note dated 30.07.2019, Copy of demand lawyer’s notice dated 16.09.2019
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johnson abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nelson Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs. 2,39,355 from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 2,39,355 from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at 12% per annum on the amount from the date of suit till decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs. 2,39,355 from the date of suit till date.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at 6% per annum on the amount from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs. 2,39,355 from date of decree till date of realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed to contest the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the amount collected from the plaintiff’s customer.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the amount collected from the plaintiff’s customer.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original of agreement for settlement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement admitting receipt of the amount and agreeing to repay.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document for the amount payable to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of demand Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notices sent to the defendant for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of the notices by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Harvest caterers (P)Ltd vs Vijayan Sankar regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Harvest caterers (P)Ltd vs Vijayan Sankar regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/29/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/29/2024 - 12:00
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won