Case Summary
Harikrishnan, the petitioner, seeks to evict Mejo K.J., the respondent, from a leased property due to unauthorized subletting and material alterations to the property. The lease, originally for residential use, has been violated by the respondent using the property for commercial purposes.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to vacate the premises within 30 days
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner provided unchallenged evidence of violations of the lease agreement.
The petitioner provided unchallenged evidence of violations of the lease agreement.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed with costs. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners/landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Harikrishnan (56 years)
T.C. 27/2638, Kochu Kettidom, FOR A C 2, Forest Lane, Vazhuthacaud, Trivandrum-695 014
Defendants
Mejo K.J. (42 years)
Kundukulam House, Parappur, Tholur, Thrissur-682552
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner seeks to evict the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
Therefore, it is found that the petitioner has proved his case, and therefore, he is entitled to get an order of eviction against the respondent, as he prayed for.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is granted possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners/landlord in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is granted possession of the schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners/landlord in possession of the schedule building under Section 11(4)(i) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is granted possession of the schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners/landlord in possession of the schedule building under Section 11(4)(ii) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show that a notice was sent to the respondent demanding vacant possession.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Unserved Cover containing Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to indicate that the lawyer notice was returned unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Original lease agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the terms of the lease between the petitioner and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3