Case Summary
Plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant for the fixation of boundary and injunction, but the matter was settled between the parties through a compromise specifying the terms.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the matter was settled through a compromise specifying the terms of boundary fixation and a way set out by way of easement by grant.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for fixation of boundary and injunction. Matter is settled between the parties. A way has been set out by way of easement by grant. Compromise IA. 2435/2017 is filed by the parties specifying the above terms. Since the terms of compromise are lawful. Suit is dismissed as per the terms. (Pronounced by me in open court, this, the 24th day of October , 2017)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hanna Ushakumari
- Relation
- W/o. Pradeep Jayaraj
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yoosaf
- Relation
- S/o, Aliyamutty(late)
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hanna Ushakumari vs Yoosaf regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Hanna Ushakumari vs Yoosaf regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement