Case Summary
Gopi Mohanan filed a complaint against Lokhanadhan alleging an offence punishable under section 138 of the N.I. Act. The complainant was repeatedly absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the complaint due to the complainant's repeated absence, leading to the accused's acquittal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Since the Complainant was continuously absent, it is not possible to proceed with the trial of the case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s. 256(1) Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopi Mohanan
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lokhanadhan
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.K. Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The complaint is dismissed
Evidence:
Hence, the complaint is dismissed u/s 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopi Mohanan vs Lokhanadhan regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Gopi Mohanan vs Lokhanadhan regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act