Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Gopalakrishnan and Santhammal, filed a suit against the defendants, Appu and Ponnammal. The suit was ultimately dismissed as it was not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as it was not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopalakrishnan
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhammal
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Appu
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ponnammal
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Malu Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sangeetha Thankachan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B.Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit not pressed and endorsed.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023