Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 19/2025

Case between Geetha Surendran vs Jayachandran M.N regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-15
Duration
approximately-3 years 8 months
Case Closed
Mon, 09/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Geetha Surendran, is seeking to recover a loan amount from her brother, Jayachandran M.N. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has not returned the loaned amount and owes her interest as well.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the total amount owed along with interest. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of 9,51,301/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the total amount owed along with interest. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved with uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved with uncontested evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 9,51,301/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha Surendran
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayachandran M.N
Party Age
65
Plaintiffs Documents
Computer Print out of Statement of account for the period from 01.01.2021 to 01.01.2023 with Certificate u/s. 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanal C.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Benraj K.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹9,51,301 with interest.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the defendant owe a total amount of 951301/- to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to substantiate the plaintiff's claim regarding the money owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Geetha Surendran vs Jayachandran M.N regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Geetha Surendran vs Jayachandran M.N regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won