Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No. 56/2020

Case between Fortune Chits and Investments vs P.U.Scaria regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha N A
Order Date
2024-06-29
Duration
approximately-3 years 26 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Fortune Chits and Investments filed a suit against P.U.Scaria for the realization of money. The cause of action arose on 03/07/2020.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹4,06,700 along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant do pay ₹4,06,700 together with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was decreed based on the merits of the claim and the evidence presented by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed. The defendant do pay ₹4,06,700(Rupees Four Lakhs Six Thousand and Seven Hundred only) together with the interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of decree to the plaintiff and thereafter the defendant do pay interest @ 6% per annum until the date of realization to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Fortune Chits and Investments (Age not specified years) Ellora Towers, Kolenchery

Defendants

P.U.Scaria (Age not specified years) Punnoorpeedika House, Ooramana Kara, Memmury Village, Pin : 686663

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant do pay ₹ 4,06,700 with interest to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed. The defendant do pay ₹ 4,06,700 (Rupees Four Lakhs Six Thousand and Seven Hundred only) together with the interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of decree to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to get costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
PW1 was examined and Ext. A1 to A4 were marked from the side of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Document Type: Exhibit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked exhibits from the side of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A4

Quick Facts

Location
Kolenchery
Case Filed
Mon, 11/02/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases