Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed under the Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act, where the petitioners are not intending to proceed further with the petition. The respondent did not enter appearance.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petitioners stated that they do not wish to proceed with the case, leading to its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence memo is accepted. Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Flowery Jose Papanchery
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jose Pappancherry
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs P. Shermila
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sharan Shahier, Mohammed S., Itty Paulson, Treesa Shaji & Stephy Mary Saji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
Evidence:
The petitioner filed a memo stating that they are not intending to proceed further with the petition. Hence memo is accepted. Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Flowery Jose Papanchery vs Mrs P. Shermila regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Flowery Jose Papanchery vs Mrs P. Shermila regarding Rent Control