Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 38/2024

Case between Flowery Jose Papanchery vs Mrs P. Shermila regarding Rent Control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed under the Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act, where the petitioners are not intending to proceed further with the petition. The respondent did not enter appearance.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitioners stated that they do not wish to proceed with the case, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence memo is accepted. Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Flowery Jose Papanchery (68 years years) Waterford Villa, Kundanur, Maradu­682304 Jose Pappancherry (68 years years) Waterford Villa, Kundanur

Defendants

Mrs P. Shermila (Age not specified years) Archies, Door no 28/613A, Ground Floor, DD Cornerstone, Sahodaran Ayyapan Road, Kadavanthara Junction. Ernakulam­682020

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
Evidence:
The petitioner filed a memo stating that they are not intending to proceed further with the petition. Hence memo is accepted. Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases