Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 221 / 2023

Case between Epsilon Diagnostics vs Balasubramanian regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-17
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed
Tue, 06/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Epsilon Diagnostics is suing Balasubramanian for failing to pay for goods purchased on credit. The plaintiff claims an outstanding amount of Rs.79,291/- due to non-payment despite multiple reminders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.79,291/- along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.79,291/- along with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till date of payment or realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.79,291/- along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case with sufficient evidence including trade documents and testimony.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case with sufficient evidence including trade documents and testimony.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.79,291/- with interest from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.79,291/- (Rupees Seventy nine thousand two hundred and ninety one only) along with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Epsilon Diagnostics
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balasubramanian
Plaintiffs Documents
Notarized copy of registration certificate issued under MSME Act, extract of ledger account, office copies of invoices, screenshots of purchase orders, proof of delivery, office copy of the notice sent by e-mail.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dr. Annies George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum due along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.79,291/- along with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till date of payment or realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant's personal and asset liability was established.
Evidence:
2) Defendant shall be personally and his assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
3) Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Notarized copy of registration certificate issued under MSME Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's registration under the MSME Act.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Extract of ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the financial transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copies of invoices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the amounts owed for goods purchased by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3 series
Document Type: Screenshots of purchase orders
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the orders placed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copies of proof of delivery
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows evidence of goods delivered to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of the notice sent by e-mail
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of reminder for payment sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Epsilon Diagnostics vs Balasubramanian regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Epsilon Diagnostics vs Balasubramanian regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 06/17/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won