Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 310/2019

Case between Elsamma vs Mohanan et al regarding compromise settlement.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-07-05
Duration
approximately-6 years
Case Code No.
310
Case Closed
Sat, 07/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Elsamma is the plaintiff seeking relief against defendants Mohanan and Bissi. The case involves a compromise petition that was accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties. The terms of the compromise were deemed lawful and the survey plan was marked as part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compromise petition and Ext. C1 survey plan shall form part of the decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise petition filed by both parties. The terms of the compromise were deemed lawful and the survey plan was marked as part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise are lawful as per the court's assessment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise are lawful as per the court's assessment.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of the compromise are lawful. Compromise petition and Ext. C1 survey plan shall form part of the decree.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit having been finally heard on 05.07.2025 and the court on same day delivered the following: Compromise is recorded.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Elsamma
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bissi
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.S. Rajeswaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compromise petition filed and recorded.
Evidence:
Compromise is recorded.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The survey plan is part of the terms of the compromise and is recorded in the judgment.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 07/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won