Case Summary
E G Manoj is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against M/s Almark Housing Company Pvt. Ltd. and others. The court found that the parties have voluntarily entered into a compromise regarding the subject matter of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has recorded the compromise agreement between the parties. The suit is decreed as per the terms of the compromise reached between them.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the parties have entered into a lawful compromise regarding the subject matter of the suit.
The court found that the parties have entered into a lawful compromise regarding the subject matter of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the parties have entered into a lawful compromise regarding the subject matter of the suit.
The court found that the parties have entered into a lawful compromise regarding the subject matter of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court is convinced that the parties have entered into the compromise voluntarily. As per Order 23 Rule 3, this court is satisfied that dispute as to the subject matter of the suit has been settled between the parties.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as per terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- E G Manoj
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Almark Housing Company Pvt. Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhi Cyber Nest Apartment Owner’s Association
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Reji George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saisankar S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Binoy Davis
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mohamed Rayyan Ali
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vinod T U
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Philip T Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thomas T Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Achu Shubha Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kallyani G Menon
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Urmila M G
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rineesha Rajkumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jijo Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Teenu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aadil Shah A S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Maria Angel
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ashique Nazar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Merlin Sara George
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed as per terms of compromise.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that dispute as to the subject matter of the suit has been settled between the parties, and the compromise in writing is signed by the parties.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between E G Manoj vs M/s Almark Housing Company Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between E G Manoj vs M/s Almark Housing Company Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding injunction
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement