Case Summary
Drissya filed a petition seeking restoration of a suit, which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of suit
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the suit filed by Drissya as per the order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. petition stands allowed. Suit is restored as per the order in IA523/15.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Drissya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinod Kumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Vinod Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of suit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition for restoration of suit was allowed by the court.
Evidence:
Cost paid. petition stands allowed. Suit is restored as per the order in IA523/15.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTR
Case Code Year
2015