Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 579/2024

Case between Dinson M.T vs Arun Unnikrishnan regarding money repayment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 22 days
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Dinson M.T, is suing the defendant, Arun Unnikrishnan, for failing to repay a loan of ₹1,10,000 that was promised to be returned. After multiple reminders and a dishonoured cheque, the plaintiff seeks recovery of the amount owed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹1,28,400 with interest and costs. The court noted the defendant's failure to repay and lack of appearance in court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay an amount of ₹1,28,400 with 9% interest per annum and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹1,28,400 with interest and costs. The court noted the defendant's failure to repay and lack of appearance in court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found adequate evidence of the loan agreement and subsequent failures by the defendant to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found adequate evidence of the loan agreement and subsequent failures by the defendant to repay.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 1,28,400/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty-Eight Thousand and Four Hundred only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dinson M.T
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun Unnikrishnan
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Agreement, Original Cheque, Cheque return memo, Copy of the lawyer notice, Postal receipt, The returned envelop with A/d card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.V.Jayadeep Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.P.Ramesh Thegumpillil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hariprasad K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Xavier Jess M.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 1,28,400/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty-Eight Thousand and Four Hundred only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Interest at a rate of 9% per annum granted from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 1,28,400/-... with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to costs of litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the agreement made between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, which was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The memo from the bank confirming the dishonour of the cheque.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice sent by the plaintiff to the defendant demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of the sending of the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned envelop with A/d card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence that the notice sent to the defendant was returned unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Dinson M.T vs Arun Unnikrishnan regarding money repayment
Case Code Year
Case between Dinson M.T vs Arun Unnikrishnan regarding money repayment

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 10/28/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won