Case Summary
Dinesh K.N. filed a rent control petition against Reetha Anitha M.V. The petitioner submitted that he is not pressing the rent control petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the rent control petition as it was not pressed by the petitioner, without any costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner decided not to press the petition.
Petitioner decided not to press the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioner decided not to press the petition.
Petitioner decided not to press the petition.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner submits not pressing the rent control petition.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, rent control petition is closed as not pressed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dinesh K.N.
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reetha Anitha M.V.
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Rent Agreement, Copy of Lawyer notice, Renewed Rental agreement, Copy of notice, Reply notice, Account statement 01.01.2021 to 31.12.2023, Bank Receipt of the rent amount paid in favour of Venkateswara Shenoy
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bindu B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jincy George
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Reetha Anitha M.V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amrita Jayaram
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petitioner was not pressing the rent control petition.
Evidence:
Petitioner submits not pressing the rent control petition.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Original rent agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Renewed Rental agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Copy of notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Account Statement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Bank Receipt of the rent amount paid
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document lists several receipts ensuring payments made by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence provided by the petitioner during the hearing.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dinesh K.N. vs Reetha Anitha M.V. regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Dinesh K.N. vs Reetha Anitha M.V. regarding Rent Control