Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 163/2022

Case between Dinesh K.N. vs Reetha Anitha M.V. regarding Rent Control

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-06-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dinesh K.N. filed a rent control petition against Reetha Anitha M.V. The petitioner submitted that he is not pressing the rent control petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court closed the rent control petition as it was not pressed by the petitioner, without any costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner decided not to press the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, rent control petition is closed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dinesh K.N. (52 years) Vrindavanan Cottage, Edappally, Ernakkulam-682 024

Defendants

Reetha Anitha M.V. (39 years) Biju Mamath House, Pollethai, Kalavoor, Alappuzha District-688 522, presently at 38/1979, Avencia Life Care Medical Shop, Near Muthoot FIN CORP, High School Junction, Edappally P.O., Kochi-682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Petitioner was not pressing the rent control petition.
Evidence:
Petitioner submits not pressing the rent control petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original rent agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Renewed Rental agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Bank Receipt of the rent amount paid
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document lists several receipts ensuring payments made by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence provided by the petitioner during the hearing.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases