Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 475/2025

Case between Dhanyakumari @ Dhanya Gopinathan vs Bijukumar R et al regarding interim injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
Case Code No.
475
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dhanyakumari @ Dhanya Gopinathan filed a petition seeking an interim injunction against Bijukumar R and Shimmi G Menon. The court heard the application and granted the requested relief.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction in favor of Dhanyakumari, restraining the defendants from altering the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction in favor of Dhanyakumari, restraining the defendants from altering the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was established.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case was established.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents are restrained from altering the plaint schedule item no. 2 property until further steps.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dhanyakumari @ Dhanya Gopinathan
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bijukumar R
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shimmi G Menon
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
John Zacharia
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jayakrishnana R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents are restrained from altering the plaint schedule item no. 2 property until further steps.
Evidence:
ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents are restrained from altering the plaint schedule item no. 2 property until further steps.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between R Ramachandran Nair et al vs Sivasankarapanicker et al regarding ad interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Divya R Nair vs Deepthy R Nair et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Saina Joy et al vs Jeo George regarding obstruction to the use of bathroom/toilet.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Saina Joy, Joy Markose vs Jeo George regarding obstruction to the user of bathroom/toilet.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Pathorse vs Ambily M B et al regarding injunction against trespassing and demolition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Defendant Won