Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1597/2016

Case between Devananda Prabhu et al vs Asha Raveendran et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit.

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Devananda Prabhu and L Muthuswamy, filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner was absent and without representation, leading to the dismissal of the petition for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed because the petitioner was not represented and had not appeared in court. The notice issued to the first petitioner was returned unserved as they were not residing at the address provided.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed because the petitioner was not represented and had not appeared in court. The notice issued to the first petitioner was returned unserved as they were not residing at the address provided.
Key Reasoning:
The court found the petitioners absent and unsupported by counsel.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found the petitioners absent and unsupported by counsel.
Supporting Evidence
The court on the same day delivered the following : - O R D E R. Petitioner absent. Not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devananda Prabhu
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
L Muthuswamy
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asha Raveendran
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinaya P Naik
Relation
W/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Navaneeth P Naik
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Radha
Party Age
86
Relation
W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P G Jayashankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joseph Mary Das
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the order of dismissal of the suit and restore the suit on files.
Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Devananda Prabhu et al vs Asha Raveendran et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Devananda Prabhu et al vs Asha Raveendran et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vasudevan Pillai vs Muhammed Haneeffa C et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Johny Thomas vs Shiju alias Thampi regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Elsy James vs P.C Jose regarding restoration of original suit.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won