Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 251/2020

Case between Deepa vs Jayakumar et al regarding settlement of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
Case Code No.
251
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Deepa as the plaintiff and Jayakumar, Jithesh, and Bency Binu as defendants. The matter was settled in mediation, and the court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled that the matter was settled through mediation and decreed the suit per the terms of the compromise agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the matter was settled through mediation and decreed the suit per the terms of the compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement. Compromise agreement shall from part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepa
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jithesh
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bency Binu
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aneesh Gopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.D.Premanand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Subhash Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Geetha et al vs Prabhakaran regarding lawful agreement.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lillykutty Tomy vs K.G. Venugopal regarding suit dismissal.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.N. Manoharan et al vs Deena Panicker et al regarding suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shaji et al vs Renjith Monai et al regarding a compromise petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaraj vs Sajimon regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won